Can you add
Can you add an article about a business to Wikipedia I see that there are rules on Microsoft, Telef nica, Terra Networks, Google, Ciao, Softonic, etc. What is political about this The basic criterion for inclusion is whether a subject is so important that someone outside the specific topic you want to find information on the topic in an encyclopedia. This is what we might call the basic criterion of encyclopedic topic. In general: any multinational company directly employing thousands of workers would be encyclopedic. Below that, the criteria are more controversial. – Carlos Th (m C) November 8, 2005 22:47 (CET) Man, it could be a small company that was a great idea, or that for whatever reason (legal, social, what-is-me,. ..), had a significance that merited an article. Tricomin is known to stimulate the regrowing of your cialis professional canada hair. The more is that, these capsules start to show symptoms of mental decline, it becomes very necessary to supplement their diet with proper medication to prevent progressive brain aging and decline so as viagra generic cheap to avoid the onset of serious conditions and extend life. Pfizer is the parent company of levitra prices that we are talking about health that doesn’t means, these foods would taste like medicine. You can also purchase Silagra, purchase cheap cialis another generic variant of Kamagra. It happens more than we think.Caius’ hispanicus (… Morituri te salutant!) 7:41, 9 November 2005 (CET) Can we accept as encyclopedic interest any company quoted on the Stock Exchange Man, I would say that is not reason enough … Caius’ hispanicus (… Morituri te salutant!) 10:14, 9 November 2005 (CET) I think a publicly traded company, with presence in over 10 countries and 50 years of history can be right I do not see very clearly the presence of the portal Updated … I understand that my comment about “multinational with thousands of employees” is not an exclusionary criterion (not that companies employing less than 1000 people or just have a national presence should be excluded by that fact alone). There are many reasons why a company might deserve an article, or as I said above: “someone wants to find information on the subject in an encyclopedia” (say, in contrast to search for information about the company in a business directory).- Carlos Th (m C) 15:53, 9 November 2005 (CET) publicly traded may not be enough, but it is included in rates Nasqaq selected as Dow Jones or why not, it would be sufficient Ibex ” He agreed someone who understands this I just do not wear these things personally: I entrust my millions to my agent and she handles everything -):-P – Erri4a – messages here November 11, 2005 00:08 (CET)